|  |
|
Background
Poultry
litter consists of manure, feathers, spilled feed, woodshavings, corn husks,
and straw that accumulate on the floors of the buildings in which chickens
and turkeys are raised. It can contain disease-causing bacteria,
antibiotics, heavy metals, restricted feed ingredients including meat and
bone meal from dead cattle, and even foreign objects such as dead rodents,
rocks, nails and glass. This material is collected, processed using
techniques such as composting and deepstacking, and then added to cattle
feed because of its high protein and mineral content. There are numerous
negative health impacts associated with this practice. |
| |
 |
|
Threats to cow health and welfare
-
Mad Cow
Disease:
Poultry litter contains spilled poultry feed. Spilled feed often
contains brain and spinal cord tissue from dead cows, which is added to
the feed as a protein source for the chickens. Prions, the infective
agents for Mad Cow Disease, can be found in this tissue which is
ultimately fed back to cattle. Mad Cow Disease and its human form
variant Creutzfeldt-Jacob disease are slowly progressive, fatal diseases
affecting the central nervous system.
-
Botulism:
Outbreaks of botulism have been reported in cattle fed poultry litter in
Canada, Ireland, the United Kingdom, and Brazil.
(1,2,3,4,5)
The UK Department for Environment, Food, and Rural Affairs has
attributed several bovine botulism deaths per year to illegal poultry
litter feeding since the late 1990s.
(6)
-
Illness and mortality
from the residues of poultry drugs:
Fatal cardiac problems in cattle have been traced to
the residues of poultry drugs in the litter they were fed.(7)
-
Metals:
In addition to arsenic, toxic metals such as copper have been detected
in high concentrations in the tissues of cattle fed poultry litter. Both
arsenic and copper can cause fatal poisoning.
-
Other
bacterial infections
Threats to human health
-
Antibiotic resistance: Studies have shown that antibiotic resistant infections are
more virulent than infections that respond to antibiotics, causing
longer and more costly treatment regimens. For more information, visit
www.keepantibioticsworking.com.
-
Other foodborne
illness:
Poultry litter is also comprised of poultry excrement, which contains
disease-causing bacteria including some highly virulent strains of
Salmonella.
(8,9,10,11)
These bacteria pose risks to cattle and the humans who consume beef and
dairy products. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimate
that 76 million Americans contract a foodborne illness each year.
(12)
-
Variant Creutzfeldt-Jacob
disease (vCJD):
as described above, this practice can potentially spread the human form
of Mad Cow disease – a serious and often fatal neurological disease.
A regulatory history: the FDA and its changing policies
on chicken litter as animal feed
A ban on the feeding of poultry litter to cows is not out of the question.
In fact, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) once administered a
precautionary policy that did not allow this practice. In 1967, the FDA
issued a statement that prohibited the use of poultry litter as animal feed.
The statement asserted that the agency has “not sanctioned and does not
sanction the use of poultry litter as a feed or as a component of feed for
animals” and, “if used as animal feed, poultry litter shall be considered an
adulterant…”
(13)
However, in 1980 the agency revoked its previous statement.
(14)
It reasoned that “[b]ecause of the local character of animal waste usage as
a feed ingredient and because the states have the capacity to effectively
regulate its use,” an FDA prohibition on poultry litter as animal feed was
unnecessary. As a result, the responsibility for monitoring the use of
poultry litter as cattle feed was left up to the individual state
Departments of Agriculture.
FACT believes that turning this responsibility over to the states
is not an adequate response to the serious health risks associated with the
practice. Our research indicates that a majority of the state Departments do
not have data or a way of tracking this practice. In addition, the FDA is
responsible for assuring that animal feeds are safe, not only for the
animals but also for the ultimate consumers of the meat products that enter
interstate commerce. Therefore, because meat products are shipped
nationally, it is under the jurisdiction of the FDA to regulate and to ban
this practice.
In
2004, the agency again considered a ban after the first case of Mad Cow
Disease was discovered in the United States. A year later, the agency did
not include poultry litter as a banned material in its proposed rule.
(15,16)
The Agency proposed a ban on 90 percent of ‘specified risk material’ (bovine
brain and spinal cord material) from all feed consumed by food animals.
(17)
The final rule to address Mad Cow Disease was effective as of April 27,
2009. However, due to industry pressure, the FDA has delayed the mandatory
implementation of the rule until October 2009.
(18)
Despite having several years to prepare for the new regulations, industry
groups have claimed that they are not prepared to fulfill the minimal
requirements of this rule.
FACT has
opposed
such a
delay, and continues to urge the agency to act promptly.
Convincing the FDA to prohibit this practice will take a well-organized
and strategic response. FACT is committed to bringing about this change.
Contact us at info@foodanimalconerns.org so
we can keep you posted on steps you can take. Visit our
Donate page
to support this work and all our other efforts to make farms healthier
and more humane places for animals to live.
______________
(1) Cobb, S.
P. et al (2002). Suspected botulism in dairy cows and its implications for
the safety of human food. Veterinary Record 150: 5-8.
(2) Jean. D. et al (1995). Clostridium botulinum
type C intoxication in feedlot steers being fed ensiled poultry litter.
Canadian Veterinary Journal 36: 626-628.
(3) Ortolani, E.L. (1997). Botulism outbreak
associated with poultry litter consumption in three Brazilian cattle herds.
Veterinary and Human Toxicology 39: 89-92.
(4) Neill, S.D. (1995). Type C botulism in cattle
being fed ensiled poultry litter. Veterinary Record 124: 558-560.
(5) McLoughlin, M. et al (1988). A major outbreak
of botulism in cattle being fed ensiled poultry litter. Veterinary Record
122: 579-581.
(6)
www.defra.gov.uk
(7) Shlosberg A, et al (1992). Cardiomyopathy in
cattle induced by residues of the coccidiostat maduramicin in poultry litter
given as a feedstuff. Vet Res Commun. 1992;16(1):45-58
(8) Voogt, N. et al (2001). Comparison of selective
enrichment media for the detection of Salmonella in poultry faeces. Letters
in Applied Microbiology 32 (2), 89-92.
(9) Smyser, C. and G. Snoeyenbos (1976 ).
Examination of Poultry Litter for Salmonellae by Direct Culture and
Fluorescent Antibody Technique. Avian Diseases 20: 545-551.
(10) Hutchison, M.L. et al. (2004). Effect of
length of time before incorporation on survival of pathogenic bacteria
present in livestock wastes applied to agricultural soil. Applied and
Environmental Microbiology 70: 5111-5118.
(11) Read, S.C. (1994). A comparison of two methods
for isolation of Salmonella from poultry litter samples. Poultry Science 73:
1617-1621.
(12) Mead, P.S. et al (1999). Food-Related Illness
and Death in the United States. Emerging Infectious Diseases 5 (5): 607-625.
(13) 21 CFR 500.40.
(14) Sec. 685.100 Recycled Animal Waste (CPG
7126.34);
www.fda.gov/ora/compliance_ref/cpg/cpgvet/cpg685-100.html
(15)
www.hhs.gov/news/press/2004pres/20040126.html
(16)
www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/content/other/bse/news/july0909bse.html
(17)
www.fda.gov/OHRMS/DOCKETS/98fr/05-20196.pdf
(18)
http://www.fda.gov/cvm/CVM_Updates/BSEFinalRule042209.htm
|
|
|
 |