HomeAbout UsIssuesPublications & ResourcesMediaSupportTake Action
Issues
 Public Health
 Humane Farming
   
   Filthy Feed Campaign
  > Background Info

   Creating Markets

   Humane Choices

   Supporting Local Farmers

                                                   Background

Poultry litter consists of manure, feathers, spilled feed, woodshavings, corn husks, and straw that accumulate on the floors of the buildings in which chickens and turkeys are raised. It can contain disease-causing bacteria, antibiotics, heavy metals, restricted feed ingredients including meat and bone meal from dead cattle, and even foreign objects such as dead rodents, rocks, nails and glass. This material is collected, processed using techniques such as composting and deepstacking, and then added to cattle feed because of its high protein and mineral content. There are numerous negative health impacts associated with this practice.

 

  

Threats to cow health and welfare

  • Mad Cow Disease: Poultry litter contains spilled poultry feed. Spilled feed often contains brain and spinal cord tissue from dead cows, which is added to the feed as a protein source for the chickens. Prions, the infective agents for Mad Cow Disease, can be found in this tissue which is ultimately fed back to cattle. Mad Cow Disease and its human form variant Creutzfeldt-Jacob disease are slowly progressive, fatal diseases affecting the central nervous system.
  • Botulism: Outbreaks of botulism have been reported in cattle fed poultry litter in Canada, Ireland, the United Kingdom, and Brazil. (1,2,3,4,5) The UK Department for Environment, Food, and Rural Affairs has attributed several bovine botulism deaths per year to illegal poultry litter feeding since the late 1990s. (6)
  • Illness and mortality from the residues of poultry drugs: Fatal cardiac problems in cattle have been traced to the residues of poultry drugs in the litter they were fed.(7)
  • Metals: In addition to arsenic, toxic metals such as copper have been detected in high concentrations in the tissues of cattle fed poultry litter. Both arsenic and copper can cause fatal poisoning.
  • Other bacterial infections

Threats to human health

  • Antibiotic resistance: Studies have shown that antibiotic resistant infections are more virulent than infections that respond to antibiotics, causing longer and more costly treatment regimens. For more information, visit www.keepantibioticsworking.com.
  • Other foodborne illness: Poultry litter is also comprised of poultry excrement, which contains disease-causing bacteria including some highly virulent strains of Salmonella. (8,9,10,11) These bacteria pose risks to cattle and the humans who consume beef and dairy products. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimate that 76 million Americans contract a foodborne illness each year. (12)
  • Variant Creutzfeldt-Jacob disease (vCJD): as described above, this practice can potentially spread the human form of Mad Cow disease – a serious and often fatal neurological disease.

A regulatory history: the FDA and its changing policies on chicken litter as animal feed


A ban on the feeding of poultry litter to cows is not out of the question. In fact, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) once administered a precautionary policy that did not allow this practice. In 1967, the FDA issued a statement that prohibited the use of poultry litter as animal feed. The statement asserted that the agency has “not sanctioned and does not sanction the use of poultry litter as a feed or as a component of feed for animals” and, “if used as animal feed, poultry litter shall be considered an adulterant…”
(13)

However, in 1980 the agency revoked its previous statement. (14) It reasoned that “[b]ecause of the local character of animal waste usage as a feed ingredient and because the states have the capacity to effectively regulate its use,” an FDA prohibition on poultry litter as animal feed was unnecessary. As a result, the responsibility for monitoring the use of poultry litter as cattle feed was left up to the individual state Departments of Agriculture.

FACT believes that turning this responsibility over to the states is not an adequate response to the serious health risks associated with the practice. Our research indicates that a majority of the state Departments do not have data or a way of tracking this practice. In addition, the FDA is responsible for assuring that animal feeds are safe, not only for the animals but also for the ultimate consumers of the meat products that enter interstate commerce. Therefore, because meat products are shipped nationally, it is under the jurisdiction of the FDA to regulate and to ban this practice.

In 2004, the agency again considered a ban after the first case of Mad Cow Disease was discovered in the United States. A year later, the agency did not include poultry litter as a banned material in its proposed rule. (15,16) The Agency proposed a ban on 90 percent of ‘specified risk material’ (bovine brain and spinal cord material) from all feed consumed by food animals. (17) The final rule to address Mad Cow Disease was effective as of April 27, 2009. However, due to industry pressure, the FDA has delayed the mandatory implementation of the rule until October 2009. (18)  Despite having several years to prepare for the new regulations, industry groups have claimed that they are not prepared to fulfill the minimal requirements of this rule.  FACT has opposed such a delay, and continues to urge the agency to act promptly.

Convincing the FDA to prohibit this practice will take a well-organized and strategic response. FACT is committed to bringing about this change. Contact us at info@foodanimalconerns.org so we can keep you posted on steps you can take. Visit our Donate page to support this work and all our other efforts to make farms healthier and more humane places for animals to live.

______________

(1) Cobb, S. P. et al (2002). Suspected botulism in dairy cows and its implications for the safety of human food. Veterinary Record 150: 5-8.
(2) Jean. D. et al (1995). Clostridium botulinum type C intoxication in feedlot steers being fed ensiled poultry litter. Canadian Veterinary Journal 36: 626-628.
(3) Ortolani, E.L. (1997). Botulism outbreak associated with poultry litter consumption in three Brazilian cattle herds. Veterinary and Human Toxicology 39: 89-92.
(4) Neill, S.D. (1995). Type C botulism in cattle being fed ensiled poultry litter. Veterinary Record 124: 558-560.
(5) McLoughlin, M. et al (1988). A major outbreak of botulism in cattle being fed ensiled poultry litter. Veterinary Record 122: 579-581.
(6) www.defra.gov.uk
(7) Shlosberg A, et al (1992).   Cardiomyopathy in cattle induced by residues of the coccidiostat maduramicin in poultry litter given as a feedstuff. Vet Res Commun. 1992;16(1):45-58
(8) Voogt, N. et al (2001). Comparison of selective enrichment media for the detection of Salmonella in poultry faeces. Letters in Applied Microbiology 32 (2), 89-92.
(9) Smyser, C. and G. Snoeyenbos (1976 ). Examination of Poultry Litter for Salmonellae by Direct Culture and Fluorescent Antibody Technique. Avian Diseases 20: 545-551.
(10) Hutchison, M.L. et al. (2004). Effect of length of time before incorporation on survival of pathogenic bacteria present in livestock wastes applied to agricultural soil. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 70: 5111-5118.
(11) Read, S.C. (1994). A comparison of two methods for isolation of Salmonella from poultry litter samples. Poultry Science 73: 1617-1621.
(12) Mead, P.S. et al (1999). Food-Related Illness and Death in the United States. Emerging Infectious Diseases 5 (5): 607-625.
(13) 21 CFR 500.40.
(14) Sec. 685.100 Recycled Animal Waste (CPG 7126.34); www.fda.gov/ora/compliance_ref/cpg/cpgvet/cpg685-100.html
(15) www.hhs.gov/news/press/2004pres/20040126.html
(16) www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/content/other/bse/news/july0909bse.html
(17) www.fda.gov/OHRMS/DOCKETS/98fr/05-20196.pdf

(18) http://www.fda.gov/cvm/CVM_Updates/BSEFinalRule042209.htm

 

 

Contact Us | © Food Animal Concerns Trust. All Rights Reserved.Tel:(773) 525-4952 | Email Us